 |
|
Archant Regional Limited
Company number: 19300
Registered in England
Registered office: Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich NR1 1 RE
|
Copyright © 2008 Archant Regional. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditions
|
 |
| How to . . .
Your guide to researching
your family history |
... be a photograph detective
ROBIN VYRNWY-PIERCE
The first thing to remember when you look at a photograph is that all
the clues may lead to nothing if the picture is a reprint.
You could be looking at an 1860s photograph on an 1880s mount —
which would be a real mix-up. Clues to dates given by the mount-card might
only apply to the card, not the photograph.
In general, though, most photographs are contemporary with their mounts.
These mount-cards nearly doubled in thickness between the 1860s and 1890s.
 |
| Sometimes cards were cut to make them fit a frame —
but another picture would give the full address details. |
 |
| |
A few final tips as to the type of photograph
you might have:
Is it made of paper and cardboard? Then it can be:
A carte-de-visite
A cabinet card
A photo postcard
A non standard studio portrait.
An amateur photograph.
Is it metal? Then it might be:
A tin-type or ferrotype
A daguerreotype in a case
Is the photograph on glass? Then it might be:
An Ambrotype in a case
A glass-plate negative
Are the photographs in some form of album? If so is it a:
19th century Bible type, with leather or cloth covers and thick gold-edged
pages with cut-outs or a 20th century book type with coloured pages
with photos stuck in, or with photo corners. |
From the 1880s bevelled edges came into fashion, often gold or silver,
and this metallic colouring was applied the initials on the front of the
mount by the 1890s and early 1900s. Cream was popular throughout the period
from the earliest photographs and certainly in the 12860s and 1870s the
mounts would, in the main, be pale in colour.
Later colours got stronger and moved on to deep reds and maroons and greens
as the photographer’s imprint itself become more and more embellished.
The back of the mount soon came to be used for advertising purposes and
although few records of photographic studios survive, but you might be
able to discover information in trade directories such as Kellies or the
White’s of the relevant town, which are not always accurate or comprehensive,
but still useful.
The larger firms that had studios in a number of sites can give dating
clues by the actual address details if matched with date of purchase.
There are also different terms for photographic methods and styles which
went in and out of fashion and offer dating clues.
Album Portraits were prevalent as a style in the 1860s.
Some backs also show medals (the more of them the smaller they are) these
can give clues by their dates but really only as an earliest possible.
Sometimes cards mention a “New Instantaneous Process”
which is a reference to the faster gelatine negatives which were
common around .
These reduced exposures from seconds to fractions of seconds.
There may also be references to lighting such as the Luxograph
(1878 to about 1886), electric light (1877 on ), gas light (1879 on) and
magnesium flash (about 1886 onwards).
There were also patented processes which were often short-lived novelties
but can offer a rough date if advertised: such as the Sarony Photocrayon
(1869), the Ferranti-Turner Patent (1873) and the Mezzotint Vignette
(1876 ).
If there are traces of tissue paper on the back of the card, or if the
original tissue is fully attached, which folded over the photograph for
protection, then the card is probably from the 1880s or 90s.
You will also find Japanese or Oriental designs on the back of many mount
cards at this time. This was part of a general Oriental trend.
If there is any handwritten detail on the back of the card this could
be useful but can till be unreliable — after all it may well have
been written at a later date by a grown-up child after a parent’s
death.
A date written on the back may refer to the date it was given not the
date it was taken.
Clothing can offer many clues but remember to check the age of the sitter
before making an assumption.
Remember some people kept the same clothes for decades as a matter of
economy, and older people definitely preferred to stick to tried and trusted
styles.
A rural sitter might also be well behind London fashions although in Norwich,
for instance, they might keep up with the fashion.
The best you can hope for is to identify the first appearance of certain
clothes on the fashion scene. Male dress is difficult to date because
it did not change much and the clothing of sitters in head-and-shoulders
portraits is barely visible.
Backdrops, especially painted ones as opposed to plain backcloths, were
also ‘in’ at certain times.
The late 1890s saw the rise in popularity of ladies’ bicycles, so
studios would keep one as a prop to save clients having to wheel them
down to the shop (some may not even have owned one but to use it in a
picture gave a sense of style.
Boys in sailor suits might have mastheads in the backgrounds and young
women were often photographed on swings in the early 1880s.
The poses adopted by the sitters derived from painting conventions. Unsmiling
and solemn people were aiming to give the impression of being serious,
dependable and honest normally they might not have looked so grim and
humourless people in everyday life.
Also consider a sense of occasion as Victorians went to the photographer
to mark the most important events in a family — birth, rites of
passage, marriage and death.
Portraits were also taken of men who had joined the services, of families
before they emigrated, of sportsmen and women who had won championships.
All sorts of momentous events were recorded by the camera for people to
keep for posterity.
This was a time when the major events were recorded in the family Bible
— and once photographs came in they too were part of the process.
You couldn’t stick pictures in the Bible so they did the next best
thing and created leather-bound volumes to hold their pictures and if
put side by side it could sometimes be hard to tell the Bible from the
photograph album
The photograph of a single woman, in a smart dress (bearing in mind that
even into Edwardian times many women got married in a best dress not a
specially made one) with an openly displayed ring or rings on her fingers,
could be a marriage or engagement portrait.
A young couple standing together might be brother and sister or an engaged/married
couple. The important thing to look for is the ring, or a flower in the
man’s buttonhole.
Another variation is the matched portrait that would have been placed
on facing pages in the photograph album. These were often taken to mark
an engagement, a wedding or, with older couples, an anniversary.
Another anniversary pose might show the couple with their family around
them. Remember that only family members touched and a young man standing
next to a daughter of the house in such a picture, but without touching
her, could be her future husband not a present one — yet another
good way to pinpoint a date for a picture.
Then we come to memorial cards and people in mourning dress such as a
sash or armband. This did not necessarily mean a death in the family as
sometimes a Royal death might be marked by such mourning especially if
the photo had been planned well in advance.
Some photographs, however, when you take style of dress and other factors
into account, may appear to date from one decade, but the mount-card may
date from another.
The may be reprints made as a memorial to the person portrayed and would
then be circulated amongst the family.
You might find they are edged with a black border and if the reprint was
taken from an existing print rather than a negative then the print will
show lack of definition.
Mourning dress in photographs stands out; black crepe bands and ribbons
were added to dresses and black armbands were worn by men.
Even post-mortem photographs might be taken of the dead person, especially
children who would be laid out fully dressed as if sleeping.
These were meant to comfort the bereaved relatives.
Finally we come to children and you must remember that in Victorian times
commercial photography rarely featured naked babies on bearskin rugs.
They tended to show small children fully dressed until the at least the
1890s. After that bare feet and simple shifts began to appear. Babies
at christenings tended to be in long robes.
Boys wore dresses and had long hair in the early part of their childhood,
so what you might think is a cute little girl with curling ringlets might
easily be a photograph of her brother.
When a boy was “breeched”, or put in short trousers for the
first time, this event was frequently recorded in the studio
More
>>
|
 |
 |
|
Members:
|
 |
|
|